image description

Leak Exposes Millions of Dollars in New Payments In Odebrecht Cash-for-Contracts Scandal:  by ICIJ

Posted on by Shruti Shah

New story from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) on Odebrecht. The ICIJ obtained more than 13,000 documents that had been stored by Odebrecht’s Division of Structured Operations on a secret communications platform known as Drousys. For more than four months, ICIJ worked in partnership with more than 50 journalists in 10 countries to investigate the ledgers of Odebrecht’s bribery division. According to the ICIJ, the leaked records reveal hidden payments across the region that extend far beyond what has been publicly reported.  Quote from S Shah of the Coalition for Integrity: “It’s mind-boggling to even understand how this went on for so long.” Read more here

End anonymous shell companies to protect national security

Posted on by Shruti Shah

Article by Shruti Shah, President & CEO and Michael Hershman, C4I Board of Directors Member. Read more here

Follow the Money

Posted on by Shruti Shah

DOJ Is investigating Whether U.S. Payoffs to Iraqi Officials Opened the Door for ISIS. Read more

Charges in Panama Papers Probe Shine Light on ‘Enablers’

Posted on by Shruti Shah

Charges announced last week against four people with ties to defunct Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca & Co. demonstrate how professional service providers potentially can enable abuse of the financial system, observers say. Read more, here.

“This may be just the beginning.” U.S. unveils first criminal charges over Panama Papers

Posted on by Shruti Shah

Nearly three years after the publication of a massive leak of secret offshore shell-company documents known as the Panama Papers, U.S. prosecutors announced criminal charges Tuesday against four people, including a former top lawyer for Mossack  Fonseca & Co., the Panamanian firm that helped dictators, drug lords and the ultra-wealthy hide their cash. Read more, here.

How did Tuesday’s election influence the S.W.A.M.P. index?

Posted on by Shruti Shah

While much of the focus on the mid-term elections was on who got elected, there were significant results regarding how candidates get elected and the ethics rules to which they are subject once in office. Read more

Virginia Does Not Fare Well in SWAMP Index (WVTF)

Posted on by Michael Pope


It all started with corruption trial of former governor Bob McDonnell. Shruti Shah at the Coalition for Integrity was blogging about the trial, and she realized that state laws governing what kinds of gifts elected officials can receive were pretty thin. That gave her an idea. “I should come up with a comparative scorecard on certain ethics and transparency related legislation in the 50 states and DC,” Shah remembered. “So that really was the inspiration for what is now the SWAMP Index.” The SWAMP index gives Virginia a score of 35, which Shah points out is a failing grade.   SWAMP is an acronym for States With Anti-corruption Measures for Public officials. Read More


Does Idaho need to drain the swamp? State lags in national anti-corruption ranking (McClatchy News)

Posted on by Kellen Browning


Far from the reaches of Washington, D.C., there may be another swamp in need of draining: Boise. Idaho’s anti-corruption rules are the third-worst in the country, according to a new national ranking called the S.W.A.M.P. Index, giving elected officials less incentive to avoid ethical violations.

The Index is a project produced by the Coalition for Integrity, a nonpartisan advocacy group that analyzes state laws governing ethics agencies, gift giving and campaign contribution reporting. Idaho scored 16 points out of 100 in the ranking of various anti-corruption laws, placing it ahead of only Wyoming (12 points) and North Dakota (0 points). Read More

What is the S.W.A.M.P. Index telling us about state ethics agencies? (FCPA Blog)

Posted on by Shruti Shah


Two weeks ago the Coalition for Integrity released the S.W.A.M.P. Index, which ranks and scores all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia based on the laws governing ethics and transparency in the executive and legislative branches. I am very encouraged by the response to the index and the questions we have already received. Our hope is that voters demand commitments to address the shortcomings in their state’s legal framework as identified in our report. The results are not only essential to a voter’s understanding of their state’s ethics agencies, but also to current and future elected-officials so they understand how their state’s legal framework compares to those in other states and can work towards plugging loopholes. Read More

Which US state is most corruption-prone? Look away, North Dakota (Quartz)

Posted on by Max de Haldevang


The US public has spent the past two years riveted by high-level corruption scandals and allegations in Washington, DC. They should also be looking closer to home, according to a new report by anti-corruption NGO Coalition for Integrity. The NGO graded all 50 states plus Washington, DC, on the strength of their anti-corruption laws and regulations, and found that only sixteen got a passing grade of 60% or more. North Dakota came in last with 0% and Wyoming behind it at 12%. Read More