Fix Virginia’s corruption problem
October 3, 2019C4I CEO Shruti Shah published an op-ed in the Washington Post discussing the dismal state of anticorruption enforcement in Virginia. Read more here.
Coalition for Integrity releases new report on U.S. states
October 3, 2019C4I’s CEO Shruti Shah and Policy Advisor Laurie Sherman wrote in the FCPA Blog about C4I’s report on Enforcment of Ethics Rules by State Ethics Agencies. Read more here.
U.S. State Ethics Agencies Must Improve Both Enforcement and Transparency
October 3, 2019C4I CEO Shruti Shah and Legal Fellow Alex Amico recently published a Guest Post in the Global Anticorruption Blog. They discuss our recent report on Enforcement of Ethics Rules by State Ethics Agencies, the current state of enforcement across the country, and what can be done to improve ethics regimes. Read more here.
Follow the Money
February 12, 2019DOJ Is investigating Whether U.S. Payoffs to Iraqi Officials Opened the Door for ISIS. Read more
Charges in Panama Papers Probe Shine Light on ‘Enablers’
December 12, 2018Charges announced last week against four people with ties to defunct Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca & Co. demonstrate how professional service providers potentially can enable abuse of the financial system, observers say. Read more, here.
“This may be just the beginning.” U.S. unveils first criminal charges over Panama Papers
December 4, 2018Nearly three years after the publication of a massive leak of secret offshore shell-company documents known as the Panama Papers, U.S. prosecutors announced criminal charges Tuesday against four people, including a former top lawyer for Mossack Fonseca & Co., the Panamanian firm that helped dictators, drug lords and the ultra-wealthy hide their cash. Read more, here.
How did Tuesday’s election influence the S.W.A.M.P. index?
November 8, 2018While much of the focus on the mid-term elections was on who got elected, there were significant results regarding how candidates get elected and the ethics rules to which they are subject once in office. Read more
Virginia Does Not Fare Well in SWAMP Index (WVTF)
October 23, 2018
It all started with corruption trial of former governor Bob McDonnell. Shruti Shah at the Coalition for Integrity was blogging about the trial, and she realized that state laws governing what kinds of gifts elected officials can receive were pretty thin. That gave her an idea. “I should come up with a comparative scorecard on certain ethics and transparency related legislation in the 50 states and DC,” Shah remembered. “So that really was the inspiration for what is now the SWAMP Index.” The SWAMP index gives Virginia a score of 35, which Shah points out is a failing grade. SWAMP is an acronym for States With Anti-corruption Measures for Public officials. Read More
Does Idaho need to drain the swamp? State lags in national anti-corruption ranking (McClatchy News)
October 18, 2018
Far from the reaches of Washington, D.C., there may be another swamp in need of draining: Boise. Idaho’s anti-corruption rules are the third-worst in the country, according to a new national ranking called the S.W.A.M.P. Index, giving elected officials less incentive to avoid ethical violations.
The Index is a project produced by the Coalition for Integrity, a nonpartisan advocacy group that analyzes state laws governing ethics agencies, gift giving and campaign contribution reporting. Idaho scored 16 points out of 100 in the ranking of various anti-corruption laws, placing it ahead of only Wyoming (12 points) and North Dakota (0 points). Read More
What is the S.W.A.M.P. Index telling us about state ethics agencies? (FCPA Blog)
October 16, 2018
Two weeks ago the Coalition for Integrity released the S.W.A.M.P. Index, which ranks and scores all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia based on the laws governing ethics and transparency in the executive and legislative branches. I am very encouraged by the response to the index and the questions we have already received. Our hope is that voters demand commitments to address the shortcomings in their state’s legal framework as identified in our report. The results are not only essential to a voter’s understanding of their state’s ethics agencies, but also to current and future elected-officials so they understand how their state’s legal framework compares to those in other states and can work towards plugging loopholes. Read More